CORRECTED-Tennis-Murray's triumph the antithesis of British failure

(Corrects 21st paragraph to Bunny Austin from Fred Perry)

LONDON, Sept 11 (Reuters) - British tennis was savouring its

first male grand slam champion for 76 years on Tuesday but Andy

Murray's extraordinary feat in New York was actually the

antithesis of decades of failure from the nation where the sport

was born.

The 25-year-old's refusal to accept second best in Monday's

U.S. Open final against Serbian ironman Novak Djokovic, to stare

defeat in the face and still find the will to outlast one of

sport's greatest warriors are not qualities to be found in any

of Britain's Lawn Tennis Association coaching manuals.

If they were, Scot Murray might not be ploughing a lone

furrow in the world's top 100 in which he is the only British

male.

Thanks to the hugely profitable Wimbledon championships,

British tennis enjoys a budget that is the envy of the rest of

the world, yet its failure to provide a crop of players capable

of competing at the highest echelons of men's tennis has long

been a cause for embarrassment and amusement.

Before a scrawny, teenage Murray announced himself as a

major talent by winning the U.S. Open juniors in 2004, Wimbledon

nearly-man Tim Henman had shouldered the nation's hopes year

after year along with Canadian-born Greg Rusedski.

Henman grew up with a tennis court in his back garden and

Rusedski on the other side of the Atlantic. Like Murray, they

were not products of a failing system.

When Henman and Rusedski, a former U.S. Open runner-up,

neared retirement, British tennis was staring at an alarming

black hole. However, Murray's mother and coach Judy had the

courage and foresight to pack her son off to Barcelona aged 15

to acquire a proper tennis education.

Already blessed with a razor sharp tennis mind and a natural

feel for ball on strings, it was at the Sanchez Vicario Academy

that Murray honed the metronomic groundstrokes that did for

Djokovic with thousands of hours of relentless hitting drills.

PERCEIVED UNDER-ACHIEVEMENT

The fruits of that labour soon became apparent as Murray

climbed 449 places in the world rankings after turning

professional in 2005, reaching the third round of Wimbledon

where he lost in five sets to Argentina's David Nalbandian.

Yet, those early steps into the seniors were difficult ones.

Still growing into his 18-year-old frame, Murray's physical

conditioning was clearly lacking, while his messy hair and

whiskers, dishevelled appearance and teenage scowl did not

endear him to a British public still yearning for that "nice

chap Tim" to come up trumps.

Not that Murray really cared.

Clearly prepared to go it alone, he focused all his energy

on getting fitter and stronger, rather than indulging in

popularity contests.

He hired, then fired, Andre Agassi's former coach Brad

Gilbert and surrounded himself with a team with whom he felt

comfortable, headed by coach Miles Maclagan who came on board in

2007.

Murray reached his first grand slam final in 2008, losing to

Roger Federer at Flushing Meadows.

He lost to Federer again in the 2010 Australian Open final

and 12 months later fell to Djokovic, meaning that in his first

three grand slam finals he had failed to win a single set -

prompting unfair suggestions that he was too passive and

"choked" when it came to the crunch.

When Djokovic, a few weeks younger than Murray, broke the

grand slam domination of Federer and Rafa Nadal, culminating in

the Serb's incredible 2011 when he was almost unbeatable, the

focus on Murray's perceived under-achievement grew more intense.

Murray, who had dispensed with Maclagan's services in 2010,

responded by hiring Ivan Lendl at the start of 2012, the

poker-faced Czech-born multiple grand slam champion who made a

career out of winning titles rather than friends.

It has proved to be a masterstroke with Murray proving

beyond doubt he is a bone-fide member of the "big four".

Few doubted that Murray had what it took to break his grand

slam duck but Lendl appears to have eradicated the demons that

often haunted the Scot on the biggest of stages.

Murray became the first British man since Bunny Austin in

1938 to reach the Wimbledon final this year and his performance

against Federer illustrated his new belief, even if it did end

in tearful failure as the Swiss maestro battled back to victory

after Murray had won the opening set.

The British public took Murray to their heart after that

emotional defeat and he rewarded them a month later when he

returned to the All England Club to beat Djokovic and then

Federer on his way to Olympic gold.

Failure to back that up and beat Djokovic in the

cauldron-like atmosphere on Arthur Ashe Stadium would have given

more ammunition to the doubters.

When he surrendered the third and fourth sets to the

rampaging Serb, it looked odds on that Murray would become the

first man to lose his first five grand slam finals.

Instead, like a true champion, he found another gear to

clinch a momentous five-hour triumph as the New York crowd

roared its approval.

With the monkey finally off his back, Federer in the

twilight of his career and Nadal's knees creaking, 2013 promises

even greater rewards for Murray whose rivalry with Djokovic is

already shaping up to become one of the sport's most

entertaining.

(Editing by Mark Meadows)