Bob Dylan says plagiarism charges made by 'wussies and pussies'

* Songwriter says quotation in folk, jazz is rich tradition

* Dylan's makes first public rebuff of accusations

* Says critics can 'rot in hell'

NEW YORK, Sept. 12 (Reuters) - Bob Dylan has angrily

responded to charges he plagiarized some of his lyrics, calling

critics "wussies and pussies" and saying musical appropriation

is "part of the folk tradition."

In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine for its Friday

edition, the influential singer-songwriter made his first public

comments on the accusations, saying that in folk and jazz music

"quotation is a rich and enriching tradition."

"Everyone else can do it but not me," he complained. "There

are different rules for me."

Rolling Stone released excerpts of the interview on

Wednesday and Reuters obtained a complete transcript.

In 2003, the Wall Street Journal reported that lyrics from

Dylan's 2001 record "Love and Theft" were remarkably similar to

phrases in an obscure 1995 biography of a Japanese mobster.

A line from the biography, "I'm not as cool or forgiving as

I might have sounded" was compared to Dylan's "I'm not quite as

cool or forgiving as I sound." Twelve such similar phrasings

have been identified.

In 2006, the New York Times made similar claims about a

Civil War era poet's phrasings and Dylan's 2006 record "Modern

Times."

"I'm working within my art form," the 71 year-old singer

told Rolling Stone. "It's that simple. ... It's called

songwriting. It has to do with melody and rhythm, and then after

that, anything goes. You make everything yours. We all do it."

"These are the same people that tried to pin the name Judas

on me," Dylan added, referring to bitter 1960s folk fans who

decried his move into electric guitar blues and famously

compared the singer to the Biblical apostle who betrayed Jesus.

"Judas - the most hated name in human history!" he

exclaimed. "If you think you've been called a bad name, try to

work your way out from under that. Yeah, and for what? For

playing an electric guitar? As if that is in some kind of way

equitable to betraying our Lord and delivering him up to be

crucified. All those evil ... can rot in hell," he said.

ART DIFFERENT FROM WRITING

Musical appropriation - using familiar cultural references

or language in a new context - is different from non-fiction

writing or journalism, said Sean Wilentz, a Princeton University

professor of American history who has written extensively about

Dylan.

"Of course it's legitimate," Wilentz told Reuters on

Wednesday of Dylan's use of others' material. "Dylan's frame of

reference is so much larger than most songwriters' - more

literary, historical and philosophical."

Wilentz said crediting bits and pieces of another's work is

scholarly tradition, not an artistic tradition.

"Creating art is different, and always has been, especially

the kind Dylan creates," he said.

Dylan, who released "Tempest," his 35th studio album this

week, has been scrutinized throughout his 50-year career, at

least in part because he has proven so unpredictable and defied

convention at virtually every turn.

In 2006, he stunned fans when he appeared in a sensuous

Victoria's Secret commercial. In 1990, he released an album made

up largely of children's nursery rhymes. In the late 1970s, the

Jewish-raised Dylan embraced Christianity and sang only

religious-themed music for several years.

In a 50-year career, he has won 11 Grammys, an Academy

Award, a Pulitzer Prize, the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom

and numerous other awards.

"I'm not like you," he told the Rolling Stone interviewer at

one point.

(Reporting By Chris Francescani; editing by Jill Serjeant and

Todd Eastham)