Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    UPDATE 2-UAE's Etisalat sues Indian JV partners for fraud

    * Etisalat accuses Indian partner of fraud

    * Indian partner refutes claims

    * Etisalat says faces significant financial losses

    * UAE telco wrote off $827 mln in India venture

    (Recasts, adds DB Group quote, analyst comment)

    By Matt Smith

    DUBAI, FEB 23 - UAE telecoms operator Etisalat

    on Thursday said it had launched legal proceedings

    against its Indian joint venture partners alleging fraud in an

    attempt to recover some of the losses arising from its

    scandal-hit investment in the country.

    Etisalat said the action being prepared was against Vinod

    Goenka and Shahid Balwa, top executives at its India partner DB

    Group, and against Majestic Infracon Private Limited, a DB Group

    company, for fraud and misrepresentation.

    Majestic denied the charges. "No notice of demand or suit

    papers have been received by us," the company said in an emailed

    statement. "There is no wrongdoing by us or our directors."

    On Wednesday, Etisalat said it would shut down the

    operations of the venture, Etisalat DB (EDB), in which it owns a

    45 percent stake, after the unit's 15 licences were among 122

    India's Supreme Court ordered to be scrapped.

    Etisalat paid $900 million in 2008 for its stake in Swan

    Telecom, later renamed Etisalat DB, with Majestic owning 45.7

    percent.

    "Etisalat's case is that it was induced into its investment

    in the company without any disclosure of the matters that are

    now alleged to have occurred in connection with the obtaining of

    2G licences by EDB," Etisalat said in an emailed statement.

    "Those events occurred a year before Etisalat's investment.

    Etisalat is facing very significant financial losses on its

    investment in EDB despite its having no involvement in the 2G

    license application or award process and being entirely innocent

    of any allegations relating to it."

    On Feb. 9, the UAE firm wrote off $827 million relating to

    EDB.

    The unit has licences for 15 of India's 22 telecom zones and

    its 1.7 million subscribers as of December ranked it 14th in a

    15-operator market.

    "Etisalat had problems from day one in India - it could only

    do a soft launch of its services and its market share was

    non-existent," said a Gulf-based telecoms analyst who asked not

    to be identified. "Whether Etisalat wins the case will depend on

    what sort of warranties were built into the contracts between

    the parties. It is likely to take years to resolve."

    "There were complaints about the 2G auction before Etisalat

    bought into Swan, so Etisalat will have difficulty saying it had

    no idea there could be problems with the licences."

    EDB was slow to roll out services, for which it was rebuked

    last year by the Indian government, while in January network

    host Reliance Communications said it had cut off the

    operator over non-payment of fees for using its towers.

    "Etisalat will still be liable for money owed to Reliance,"

    added the analyst.

    Relations between Etisalat and its joint venture partner

    have been tense for some time.

    Last year, Majestic filed a case against Etisalat with

    India's company law board, alleging mismanagement of their joint

    venture, which was under the management control of the UAE firm.

    Separately, DB Realty, a listed property company

    of the DB Group, said in a statement the shutdown of Etisalat DB

    would have no bearing on its financials because this was an

    investment by its founders in their personal capacity.

    DB Realty's shares ended 4.7 percent lower in Mumbai on

    Thursday.

    (Additional reporting by Devidutta Tripathy; in New Delhi;

    Editing by Dinesh Nair and Andrew Callus)

     

    There are no comments yet